REVEALED TO US BY L.T., OVER TWO YEARS AGO.
THE SCIENCE:
Lord Tutinean
Electrodynamic Profile Ramping
Explanation
October 5, 2021
Energy Budget as Designed for Hybrid-of-a-Hybrid
Hydrogen Generation
Indeed:
Fundamentally. Please be aware that hydrogen production within my design was never considered outside my design nor as a stand alone product. It was included in the original patent as part of the total design.
The initial experiments from which I shall be speaking here were rudimentary but dependent upon energy generation and energy availability. That necessary energy being abundant for even the most archaic and wasteful electrolysis methods.
My preferred method of electrolysis is modern, more efficient, and exotic.
Further. It has always been my intent to avoid the added losses of putting the then derived hydrogen through any other wasteful conversion processes but inject it into an environment where I could take advantage of the fact that the derived hydrogen had already initially arrived in a fulfilled stoichiometrically complete state.
My Design Focus:
Regardless of the chosen method of electrolysis employed ( but seeking to use the most efficient of course ) the Electrodynamic Profile Ramping system featuring the Claxston stack, would create hydrogen at a sustainable and controllable, throttle-controlled rate that would be measured by time and not by miles or by weight in actual over-the-road use cases.
Assuming the case of the least efficient electrolysis method known in scientific history I state the following.
The least efficient method of water electrolysis is using the direct current (DC) electrolysis process. This means: the electrical energy required for electrolysis is directly converted into chemical energy to produce hydrogen gas.
Initially. My hope was that KyronMAX experimentation ( even a KyronMAX “ alloy “) might show itself to be resistant to both hydrogen donor effects ( acid ) and embrittlement ( primary storage). Unfortunately funding theft by OTHERS eliminated access to the material and modest resources needed to advance.
The Method:
To determine the energy required to meet my target which was to produce one mole of hydrogen every 15 seconds at standard temperature and pressure (STP), considering the Faraday's law of electrolysis. one mole of electrons (F, Faraday's constant) is required to make one mole of ANY element during an electrochemical reaction.
The Faraday's constant = 96,485 coulombs per mole (C/mol).
To produce one mole of hydrogen gas one mole of electrons is mandatory.
I need the amount of electrical charge required to produce one mole of electrons under the most inefficient conditions and methods known to mankind. Best calculated using :
Charge (Q) = Faraday's constant (F) × moles of electrons
My goal was to produce one mole of hydrogen every 15 seconds. The charge required in 15 seconds is hence:
Charge (Q) = (96,485 C/mol) × (1 mol)
In order to calculate the power (P) required to provide this charge at the proper electrode every 15 seconds. Power is defined as the rate at which energy is consumed or produced and is measured in watts (W). The formula to calculate power is:
Power (P) = Charge (Q) × Voltage (V) / Time (t)
I then multiply the power by time to obtain the energy (E):
Energy (E) = Power (P) × Time (t)
To calculate the energy required for the electrolysis of one mole of hydrogen every 15 seconds, I set the voltage used in the process. Since I specified and targeted specifically the least efficient method, let's assume a relatively high voltage of 3 volts for this calculation( this low number is considered high by old school standards).
plugging in the values into the formulas:
Charge (Q) = (96,485 C/mol) × (1 mol) = 96,485 C
Power (P) = Charge (Q) × Voltage (V) / Time (t) = (96,485 C) × (3 V) / 15 s
Energy (E) = Power (P) × Time (t) = [(96,485 C) × (3 V) / 15 s] × 15 s
Now calculating:
Energy (E) = (96,485 C) × (3 V) = 289,455 J
Therefore, using the least efficient method of water electrolysis, it would require approximately 289,455 joules of energy to produce one mole of hydrogen every 15 seconds at standard temperature and pressure (STP).
ENERGY GENERATION AT THE CORE OF THE ELECTRODYNAMIC PROFILE RAMPING POWERTRAIN
( Completely ignoring the profoundly important present state and evolution of the magnetic amplifier waiting to be introduced, and the potent reserves of the XXX-XXX being 128,900 joules per XXX-XXX ( 12 XXX-XXX in all at present for a total of about 1,547,000 joules ) all of which will improve with each model/version. None of these ( parts of the Claxston stack - the ‘ stack ‘) is included in these calculations. )
Here is the energy available for the creation of hydrogen AS DESIGNED to be part of my hybrid-of-a-hybrid system, per, battery, pack ( per battery pack)::
The amount of energy available from the powerful Claxston stack ( C-stack) component of the Electrodynamic Profile Ramping power plant as expressed in formula is:
Energy (E) = Voltage (V) × Current (I) × Time (t)
Converting the given amp-hours (Ah) to coulombs (C) to calculate the energy.
1 amp-hour (Ah) is equal to 3,600 coulombs (C). Therefore, 2610 amp-hours can be converted to coulombs as follows:
2610 Ah × 3600 C/Ah = 9,396,000 C
Hence and therefore the availability of energy is:
Energy (E) = Voltage (V) × Current (I) × Time (t)
= 135 V × 9,396,000 C × 1 s
= 1,267,260,000 J
Therefore, the stack as it generates 135 volts DC and 2610 amp-hours would provide approximately 1,267,260,000 joules of energy.
This is the amount of energy available to make hydrogen at the above stated production rate of one mole every 15 seconds using the worst possible, most wasteful method of making hydrogen the human race has ever used ( at 3 volts to be sure ).
A) Please try to recall seeing the modest but robust battery packs
B) Please recall seeing the magnetic amplifier proxies
C) Please recall seeing and or discussing the XXX-XXX UNITS.
D) Please try to recall the reasoning for keeping and advancing the 000-000 in the drivetrain for vehicles that use my designs
E) Please recall the general use cases for Sea, Air, Land transports.
F) Please remember that if you have questions I, L. Ferrox Tutinean, have answers. I can imagine everyone has their own opinions and sources of information - cool. I only ask for the equal opportunity to defend and explain my own work.
Goal: To create technology to ameliorate Global Climate Change and to help kill poverty:
Http://www.210en.com